There are so many facts, videos, reviews and TV shows devoted to the Building 7 collapse, that this news making event over flooded the Internet. We decided to dig for some of them and collect the evidence and interviews of experts.

Tony Szombati, Mechanical Engineer

At the Fox News he answered to the question ‘does he believe in the fire cause of WTC 7 destruction or consider it false’ that he consider it false for a couple of reasons: building 7 went into a sudden collapse across the full width and left it a building for 2.25 seconds which amounted to 105 feet, and it was full free fall acceleration that is impossible because the natural collapse columns would have to buckle, when they do so it is the minimum resistance it means it never goes to zero. He suggested it is a form of demolition devices that brought it down so fast.

Geraldo Rivera in that interview supposed that everyone sees the professional demolition of buildings leaving a footprint after collapsing. So he pointed that the footprint of WTC 7 was exactly similar.

Bob McIlvaine, whose son had died due to this catastrophe, wanted the New York City Council to open its own investigation.  The group of engineers and other supporters of that idea set up that Building What campaign. Then they asked for the independent investigation. He is to find out the reason of his son died as dozens of other people that became victims.

Larry Silverstein, Leaseholder, World Trade Center

“They were not sure they are gonna be able to contain the fire I said we have had such terrible loss of life if the smartest thing to do is his part and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse”.

Rosie O’Donnell, co-host, ABC talk show The View

While saying she didn’t know what to believe about the U.S. government’s involvement in the attacks of Sept. 11, she said, “I do believe that it’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7—building 7, which collapsed in on itself—it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved.”

James Meigs, Editor in Chief of Popular Mechanics. Interview on NY1 News

”What we have tried to do in our book at Proper Mechanics is to look at those facts look at the claims of conspiracy theorists themselves are making and see if there is any factual basis to it.”

He commissioned this exhaustively research 2005 report which became a book. Newly updated and we released it examines 25 911 theories and finds no scientific basis for any including the demolition of Building 7.